• About Us
    • Staff
    • Founders
  • Featured Projects

Cambodia Tribunal Monitor

  • Trial Observer
  • Multimedia
    • Case 002 Trial Footage
    • Case 001 Trial Footage
    • Interviews & Press Conferences
    • Memory of Atrocities Project
  • Commentary
    • Expert Commentary
    • Contributor Bios
  • News
    • Articles
    • Opinion Editorials
    • Press Releases
    • ECCC Reports
    • NGO Reports
    • Resources
  • Court Filings
    • Case 001: Kaing Guek Eav (Alias “Duch”)
    • Case 002: Nuon Chea
    • Case 002: Khieu Samphan
    • Case 002: Ieng Sary
    • Case 002: Ieng Thirith
    • Case 003
    • Case 004
    • Case 004/01: Im Chaem
    • Miscellaneous Rulings
  • History
    • Cambodian History
    • Tribunal Background
    • CTM Archives

Survivor Allegedly Spent Hours Under Corpses in a Mass Grave Before Escaping from Duch’s Killing Field

  • by Laura MacDonald, Member of the New York Bar and Consultant to the Center for International Human Rights, Northwestern University School of Law
  • — 7 Jul, 2009

Duch Challenges the Testimony of Yet Another Alleged S-21 Survivor

Today, Kaing Guek Eav (alias Duch) refuted the testimony of a third alleged survivor of Tuol Sleng prison (S-21). While Duch acknowledged the suffering of civil party Lay Chan, he argued there was no evidence the suffering happened at S-21. Duch’s defense counsel stood to announce his challenge just after Lay began his testimony.

Lay, now a 55 year old rice farmer, was arrested sometime in 1976 while working as a messenger for the Khmer Rouge. After being stripped, blindfolded, and thrown into a few different vehicles, Lay arrived at a detention facility that he now believes to be S-21. During approximately three months there, he was interrogated and tortured twice. He was accused of stealing rice for “the enemy” and conspiring with two of his former superiors. He was detained in an individual cell and only guessed there were other detainees due to the screams and footsteps he heard. Any time he was taken out of his cell, he was blindfolded. He was often taken outside at night to dig pits that he was told were for banana trees. In the most disturbing moment of his testimony, Lay started sobbing as he described being so thirsty that he drank his own urine.

One day for unknown reasons, he was thrown into a vehicle and dropped off on the outskirts of Phnom Penh all alone. Eventually, he hitched a ride back to Phnom Penh where a comrade instructed him to go to the railway station. Once there, he learned it was a re-education facility and he was put to work collecting firewood used for cooking palm sugar. After about a year, he was sent back to his original farming unit to grow vegetables and rice. He remained there until the Vietnamese seized Phnom Penh…

Read more: ctm_blog_7-7-2009

Cambodia Tribunal Monitor’s Trial Observer posts are written according to the personal observations and opinions of the writer and do not constitute a transcript of ECCC proceedings or the views of Cambodia Tribunal Monitor and/or its partners. Official court transcripts for the ECCC’s hearings may be accessed at the ECCC website.

  • Previous story Duch Denies that Another “Survivor” Was Imprisoned at S-21
  • Next story Woman and Child Added to List of Confirmed Survivors of Duch’s Secret Detention Facilities
  • Trial Observer

    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • March 2011
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009

To access Trial Observer posts prior to 2013,
please visit our Archived Site.

    • Cambodia Tribunal Monitor is a consortium of academic, philanthropic, and non-profit organizations committed to providing public access to the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia and open discussion throughout the judicial process.
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us

    © Northwestern University School of Law Center for International Human Rights and Documentation Center of Cambodia