• About Us
    • Staff
    • Founders
  • Featured Projects

Cambodia Tribunal Monitor

  • Trial Observer
  • Multimedia
    • Case 002 Trial Footage
    • Case 001 Trial Footage
    • Interviews & Press Conferences
    • Memory of Atrocities Project
  • Commentary
    • Expert Commentary
    • Contributor Bios
  • News
    • Articles
    • Opinion Editorials
    • Press Releases
    • ECCC Reports
    • NGO Reports
    • Resources
  • Court Filings
    • Case 001: Kaing Guek Eav (Alias “Duch”)
    • Case 002: Nuon Chea
    • Case 002: Khieu Samphan
    • Case 002: Ieng Sary
    • Case 002: Ieng Thirith
    • Case 003
    • Case 004
    • Case 004/01: Im Chaem
    • Miscellaneous Rulings
  • History
    • Cambodian History
    • Tribunal Background
    • CTM Archives

Case 002/1 to Resume with its Previous Scope; Nuon Chea Confirmed as Fit to Stand Trial

  • by Doreen Chen, Senior Consultant, Destination Justice, and LLM, Columbia Law School
  • — 29 Mar, 2013

observer_130329_NuonCheaDefenseTeamHearings in the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) were convened for only 20 minutes today to enable the Trial Chamber to relay oral findings on key issues affecting Case 002, namely the trial of the senior leaders of the Khmer Rouge. In particular, the Chamber announced a new decision on the scope of the first trial in Case 002. This had been necessitated by a Supreme Court Chamber decision annulling the initial scope which the Trial Chamber had determined for this case.[2]The new scope for the first trial, determined after mandatory consultation with the parties, mirrors the annulled one: that is, it will cover the first two phases of forced movement of the population, as well as the execution site Tuol Po Chrey. However, despite strenuous arguments by the Office of the Co-Prosecutors (OCP), the Trial Chamber did not add the Phnom Penh-based execution site S-21, or Tuol Sleng, to the scope of the trial.

The Chamber also announced that, following a review of testimony from court appointed medical experts, it has determined that accused person Nuon Chea remains fit to stand trial in Case 002. That trial will resume on April 8, with two witnesses scheduled to testify so far. Finally, the Chamber notably mentioned in passing that the funding situation for the national side of the tribunal appears to have been temporarily resolved, with funds now secured for all national staff until the end of April 2013.

Purpose of Today’s Hearing

At the outset of today’s hearing, Trial Chamber President Nil Nonn advised that it had a threefold purpose:

  • Announcing the Trial Chamber’s decision concerning accused person Nuon Chea’s fitness to stand trial;
  • Announcing the Trial Chamber’s decision in relation to ongoing proceedings in the Case 002 trial following the Supreme Court Chamber decision annulling the scope of Case 002/1; and
  • Advising on the ongoing trial schedule.

Following this, Trial Chamber Greffier Se Kolvuthy advised that all parties to the hearing were present but for Mr. Chea, who was observing the hearings from his holding cell due to health reasons, and International Co-Counsel for Khieu Jacques Vergès. However, Mr. Samphan himself was in the courtroom and appeared to listen to the proceedings intently. Only a few people observed today’s important announcements from the public gallery, with 250 villagers from Memut, Kampong Cham province arriving late and missing the hearing. The majority of these villagers appeared to have been born during or before the Democratic Kampuchea (DK) period.

Decision on Fitness of Accused Person Nuon Chea to Stand Trial

President Nonn then moved to the first topic, namely Mr. Chea’s fitness to stand trial. “Notwithstanding the advanced age and frailty of the accused and [his] precarious physical health,” he said, the Trial Chamber had determined on the basis of the report and testimony of the medical experts Prof. John Campbell and Dr. Seena Fazel on Monday, April 29, 2013[3]that Mr. Chea “clearly … remains capable of meaningfully participating in his own defense.” Thus, the Chamber affirmed its earlier finding that Mr. Chea was fit to stand trial. A written decision in this respect is to follow as soon as possible.

Decision Concerning the Severance of Case 002

The president turned to the question of the severance of Case 002. Providing a briefoverview of the relevant chronology, the president noted that the Trial Chamber had initially issued a severance order on September 22, 2011 “in the interests of achieving a timely verdict in Case 002.” That scope had limited the first trial in Case 002, known as Case 002/1, to forced evacuations and eventually to executions carried out at the Tuol Po Chrey execution site. However, following an appeal from the Office of the Co-Prosecutors (OCP) against this decision, on February 8, 2013, the Supreme Court Chamber decided to annul the Trial Chamber’s severance order and related decisions.

Providing some context for the Trial Chamber’s decision on how to move forward in light of this Supreme Court Chamber decision, the president said that:

Although the Supreme Court Chamber decision envisaged the possibility of a fresh severance of Case 002, the immediate consequence of the Supreme Court Chamber decision was that Case 002 was no longer confined in scope and the Trial Chamber [would be] unable to proceed to any verdict until all factual allegations and charges contained in the Case 002 Closing Order are adjudicated.

In annulling the severance of Case 002, the Supreme Court Chamber considered the Trial Chamber to have erred in its interpretation of the scope of its discretion to order severance pursuant to Internal Rule 89 ter. In failing to hear the parties prior to the issuance of its severance order and for having, among other factors, given inadequate consideration to the need to ensure that the charges retained in Case File 002/1 are sufficiently representative.

In order to minimize further delay to proceedings in Case 002, on February 12, 2013, the Trial Chamber scheduled hearings on the issue of severance, outlining a number of issues for the parties to address in the light of the Supreme Court Chamber decision. Following these hearings on February 18, 20 and 21, 2013,[4]in-court examination of the court-appointed medical experts who reassessed the fit to stand trial of the accused Nuon Chea on March 25, 2013, and having weighed the factors identified in the Supreme Court Chamber decision and the impact of the death of Ieng Sary, the Chamber issues its president decision.

The president then announced that the Trial Chamber’s decision on the question of severance and ongoing hearings in Case 002 was as follows:

For the reasons that will be outlined in its written decision, the Trial Chamber decides to sever Case 002 pursuant to Internal Rule 89 ter by confining the scope of Case 002/1 to the charges related to forced movement of population phases one and two, and executions at Tuol Po Chrey.

Upcoming Hearing Arrangements and Funding for National Staff

Finally, the president announced the arrangements which the Trial Chamber has determined for hearings in Case 002 moving forward. Under these arrangements, hearings in the case will resume on Monday, April 8, 2013, with the questioning of witness TCW 100 by the Lead Co-Lawyers for the civil parties. TCW 100, who is the former Khmer Rouge security center head Chhaom Se, had begun testifying in January 2013, with his continued testimony interrupted by the hospitalization of Mr. Chea due to bronchitis and a collapse.[5]Upon the conclusion of Mr. Se’s testimony, witness TCW 536 will testify. Trial Chamber judges will be the first to question this witness, followed by the parties to the proceedings.

The president stressed that the Chamber would do its best to ensure proceedings would be conducted in Case 002/1 as scheduled. However, he noted that this might not be possible if the Chamber was faced by challenges such as the non-attendance of essential national staff “who may not show up at work or due to budget shortfalls.” If this were to occur, he said, the Chamber would endeavor to advise parties of this by next Monday, April 1, 2013.

Judge Silvia Cartwright then advised that the United Nations Assistance to the Khmer Rouge Trials (UNAKRT) coordinator had just informed the international judges this morning that “funding for national staff has been secured through to the end of April and that ongoing discussions are underway to stabilize funding from that point on.” She did not announce who has provided this funding. However, as it was too late to schedule witnesses for next week for a variety of reasons, she advised that the Chamber preferred to keep to the April 8 schedule which had been indicated to the parties yesterday.

In addition, Judge Cartwright advised that the Chamber intended to seek further submissions from the parties concerning witnesses and experts who were to be heard in the weeks following April 8 if it considered this necessary for trial management reasons. However, pending such a request from the Chamber, the parties were advised not to propose further witness and expert lists or proposed schedules for the ongoing hearings in Case 002/1. Judge Jean-Marc Lavergne then clarified, for the purposes of those listening to this statement on the French language channel, that this meant that parties should not make such submissions unless the Trial Chamber deems it necessary.

The president then adjourned hearings for the day at the earlier time of 9.20 a.m. Hearings will resume in the ECCC at 9 a.m. on Monday, April 8, 2013, with the continued testimony of witness Chhaom Se.

Footnotes
[1]Cambodia Tribunal Monitor’s daily blog posts on the ECCC are written according to the personal observations of the writer and do not constitute a transcript of the proceedings. Official court transcripts for the ECCC’s hearings may be accessed at http://www.eccc.gov.kh/en/case/topic/2.

[2]The Supreme Court Chamber’s decision may be accessed at http://www.eccc.gov.kh/sites/default/files/documents/courtdoc/2013-02-11%2018:26/E163_5_1_13_KH.PDF(in Khmer), http://www.eccc.gov.kh/sites/default/files/documents/courtdoc/2013-02-11 18:23/E163_5_1_13_EN-1.PDF (in English), and http://www.eccc.gov.kh/sites/default/files/documents/courtdoc/2013-03-05%2015:34/E163_5_1_13_FR.pdf (in French). Cambodia Trial Monitor’s commentary on this ruling may be accessed at https://cambodiatribunal.org/blog/2013/02/expert-legal-commentary-supreme-court-chamber-invalidates-case-002-severance.

[3]Cambodia Tribunal Monitor’s daily blog post on this hearing day may be accessed at https://cambodiatribunal.org/2013/03/25/examination-of-nuon-cheas-fitness-to-stand-trial-and-renewed-discussion-of-case-002-severance/.

[4]Cambodia Tribunal Monitor’s daily blog posts on these hearing days may be accessed at https://cambodiatribunal.org/2013/02/18/trial-against-senior-khmer-rouge-leaders-should-include-crimes-at-s-21-prosecution-argues/ (February 18), https://cambodiatribunal.org/2013/02/20/defense-teams-argue-for-the-hearing-of-entire-case-002-severance-of-case-against-khieu-samphan/ (February 20), and https://cambodiatribunal.org/2013/02/21/parties-debate-upcoming-hearings-and-proposed-expansion-of-trial/ (February 21).

[5]The first day of Mr. Se’s testimony took place on January 11, 2013. Cambodia Tribunal Monitor’s daily blog post on that hearing may be accessed at https://cambodiatribunal.org/2013/01/11/military-structures-security-centers-and-internal-purges-in-the-spotlight/.

Cambodia Tribunal Monitor’s Trial Observer posts are written according to the personal observations and opinions of the writer and do not constitute a transcript of ECCC proceedings or the views of Cambodia Tribunal Monitor and/or its partners. Official court transcripts for the ECCC’s hearings may be accessed at the ECCC website.

  • Previous story Judges Reject Appeal
  • Next story UN to Pay Overdue Salaries at Cambodia Trial
  • Trial Observer

    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • March 2011
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009

To access Trial Observer posts prior to 2013,
please visit our Archived Site.

    • Cambodia Tribunal Monitor is a consortium of academic, philanthropic, and non-profit organizations committed to providing public access to the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia and open discussion throughout the judicial process.
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us

    © Northwestern University School of Law Center for International Human Rights and Documentation Center of Cambodia