• About Us
    • Staff
    • Founders
  • Featured Projects

Cambodia Tribunal Monitor

  • Trial Observer
  • Multimedia
    • Case 002 Trial Footage
    • Case 001 Trial Footage
    • Interviews & Press Conferences
    • Memory of Atrocities Project
  • Commentary
    • Expert Commentary
    • Contributor Bios
  • News
    • Articles
    • Opinion Editorials
    • Press Releases
    • ECCC Reports
    • NGO Reports
    • Resources
  • Court Filings
    • Case 001: Kaing Guek Eav (Alias “Duch”)
    • Case 002: Nuon Chea
    • Case 002: Khieu Samphan
    • Case 002: Ieng Sary
    • Case 002: Ieng Thirith
    • Case 003
    • Case 004
    • Case 004/01: Im Chaem
    • Miscellaneous Rulings
  • History
    • Cambodian History
    • Tribunal Background
    • CTM Archives

Special Panel Decides Against Disqualification of Trial Chamber Judges

  • by Laura Fearn
  • — 17 Nov, 2014

Long demanded by the defence teams of both Khieu Samphan and Nuon Chea, the Special Panel issued its November 14th decision on multiple applications for disqualification of Trial Chamber judges in Case 002/02.

Khieu Sampham, in an application of August 25, 2014, backed up by another of October 10, 2014 (in which he had asked to adopt “the argument advanced in Nuon Chea’s application in support of the first application”), and Nuon Chea (in an application made September 29, 2014), between them had sought to disqualify President Nil Nonn and judges Silvia Cartwright, Ya Sokhan, Jean-Marc Lavergne, You Ottara and Claudia Fenz from adjudicating Case 002/02.

Referring to the lack of accompanying reasons to their decision, the Special Panel noted that there was some urgency for their ruling. They said that on October 22, 2014, the Co-Prosecutors had made a “Request for an Expedited Decision,” asking that the matter be considered “as soon as possible with reasons to follow.” The judges also drew attention to Nuon Chea’s October 17, 2014, opening statement in Case 002/02, in which he declared that “he had instructed his counsel not to participate in further proceedings against him pending the Special Panel’s decision” herein. Not stated but understood was that the evidentiary hearings are due to begin only three days hence, on November 17, 2014

The decision also clarified that Nuon Chea had declined the opportunity to file a reply to the Co-Prosecutors’ response and that none of the judges subject to the disqualification application had filed any submissions.

As Judge Silvia Cartwright ceased to be a judge at the ECCC effective September 1, 2014, ultimately the challenge against her was dismissed.

The Special Panel ruled unanimously to admit all of the defence teams’ applications, but also unanimously decided to dismiss Khieu Samphan’s applications regarding disqualifying Judge Claudia Fenz. A majority of four judges (Judge Rowan Downing dissenting) dismissed the applications of both Khieu Samphan and Nuon Chea to have President Nil Nonn and Judges Ya Sokhan, Jean-Marc Lavergne and You Ottara disqualified.

It was implied by referencing the Co-Prosecutors’ request for a quick ruling that written reasons will follow but such was not actually stated in the decision.

Internal Rule 34(8) holds that the ruling is not subject to appeal.

The outstanding question is what effect this decision will have on whether or not defence counsel will attend the start of the evidentiary hearings in Case 002/02 on Monday, November 17, 2014, as they have been ordered by the Trial Chamber to do.

 

Cambodia Tribunal Monitor’s Trial Observer posts are written according to the personal observations and opinions of the writer and do not constitute a transcript of ECCC proceedings or the views of Cambodia Tribunal Monitor and/or its partners. Official court transcripts for the ECCC’s hearings may be accessed at the ECCC website.

  • Previous story KRT Judges Stay, Panel Rules – The Phnom Penh Post
  • Next story Trial Chamber Asserts Control As Khieu Samphan Defense Remains Absent
  • Trial Observer

    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • March 2011
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009

To access Trial Observer posts prior to 2013,
please visit our Archived Site.

    • Cambodia Tribunal Monitor is a consortium of academic, philanthropic, and non-profit organizations committed to providing public access to the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia and open discussion throughout the judicial process.
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us

    © Northwestern University School of Law Center for International Human Rights and Documentation Center of Cambodia