Case 001: Kaing Guek Eav (Alias “Duch”)

• Kaing Guek Eav, OCIJ, Order On Co-Prosecutors’ Request For Investigative Action Regarding Interviews of NUON Chea And The Film “Enemies Of The People”, D344/1 (09 April 2010) (accepting the Co-Prosecutors’ request to attempt to obtain the film “Enemies of the People” but declining to take steps beyond those already taken)
• Kaing Guek Eav, OCIJ, Inter-Office Memorandum of the CIJs Regarding Civil Parties Lawyers Request for Extension of the Deadline for Filing Civil Parties’ Supplementary Information, D337/3 (09 April 2010)
• Kaing Guek Eav, OCIJ, Civil Parties, Request for Extension of The Deadline For Filing Civil Parties’ Supplementary Information, D337/2 (31 March 2010)
• Kaing Guek Eav, OCIJ, Inter-Office Memorandum of the CIJs to Victims Support Unit Extending the Deadline for Filing Civil Party Applications, D337/1 (26 March 2010)
• Co-Prosecutors’ Request for Notification of Charges to Kaing Guek Eav Alias Duch (21 Jan 2010) (Requesting the Accused be notified of the charges against him).
• Co-Prosecutors’ Observations on Trial Chamber’s Request for Access to the Case File (3 Sept 2008) (Stating that the Co-Prosecutors have no objections to the Trial Chamber’s request)
• Kaing Guek Eav, OCIJ, Order Concerning Translation Rights and Obligations of the Parties (20 June 2008)
• Kaing Guek Eav, OCIJ Press Statement on Closing Order (22 August 2008)
• Kaing Guek Eav, OCIJ, Closing Order Indicting Kaing Guek Eav, Alias Duch (8 August 2008)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (8 Aug 2008) (Stating that Tioulong Antonya is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (6 Aug 2008) (Stating that Man Saut is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (6 Aug 2008) (Stating that Kae Khon is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (6 Aug 2008) (Stating that Chum Neou is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (6 Aug 2008) (Stating that Tioulong Neva is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (6 Aug 2008) (Stating that Tath Lorn is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (6 Aug 2008) (Stating that Khuon Sarin is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (6 Aug 2008) (Stating that Kong Teis is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (6 Aug 2008) (Stating that Kimari Nevinka is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (6 Aug 2008) (Stating that Kaun Sunthara is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (6 Aug 2008) (Stating that Suos Sarin is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (6 Aug 2008) (Stating that Suon Sieng is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (6 Aug 2008) (Stating that Timothy Scott Deeds is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (6 Aug 2008) (Stating that Chraing Sam-Ean is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (6 Aug 2008) (Stating that Ngeth Sok is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (6 Aug 2008) (Stating that Ros Men is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (6 Aug 2008) (Stating that the Civil Party Application of Suos Sarin was placed on the Case File and that Suos Sarin is considered a Civil Party in the Case)
• Lawyer’s Recognition Decision (30 July 2008) (Recognizing Kim Mengkhy and Martine Jacquin as the Lawyers for Meas Keth Samphotre)
• Lawyer’s Recognition Decision (30 July 2008) (Recognizing Silke Studzinsky and Hong Kim Suon as the Lawyers for Im Sunty)
• Order on Extension of Provisional Detention (28 July 2008) (Ordering the extension of the provisional detention of the Accused for another year)
• Request for Recognition of Civil Party’s Co-Lawyers (25 July 2008) (Requesting to be recognized as the Lawyers for Meas KethSamphortre)
• Order on Request for Extension of Time (17 July 2008) (Allowing the Defence Team an extension of time to file a list of documents to be translated)
• Order on Request for Extension of Time (14 July 2008) (Allowing the Co-Prosecutors an extension of time to file a list of documents to be translated)
• Visits to the Detainee (14 July 2008) (Stating that visits to the detainee must be approved by the Co-Investigating Judges and that the visits must be organized in accordance with the conditions and general procedure stated by the Administration of the Detention Center of the ECCC)
• Notice (Rule 63.7) (4 July 2008) (Notifying the Accused that the Co-Investigating Judges will be seeking to extend the Accused’s provisional detention)
• Civil Party Application (2 July 2009) (Providing the Civil Party Application of Romam Yun alias Khamphy)
• Co-Prosecutors’ Observations on Defence Request for Francois Bizot to Be Permitted to Meet Charged Person (30 June 2008) (Stating that any meeting between Bizot and the Accused before the conclusion of the entire proceedings would be improper)
• Written Record of the Swearing of Interpreters and Translators(23 June 2008) (Providing the transcript of the swearing in of ten interpreters and translators)
• Recapitulative Response to Translation Requests: A33, A75 and A97 (19 June 2008) (Stating that the documents have been transmitted for translation)
• Kaing Guek Eav, OCIJ, Order Concerning Co-Prosecutor’s Requests for Investigative Action (4 June 2008)
• Kaing Guek Eav, OCIJ, Order Concerning Civil Parties’ Requests for Investigative Action (4 June 2008)
• Civil Parties Co-Lawyers’ Request for Further Investigations According to Rule 66(1) Internal Rules (2 June 2008) (Requesting further investigations on behalf of admitted Civil Parties)
• Lawyer’s Recognition Decision (29 May 2008) (Recognizing Silke Studzinsky and Yong Phanith as the Lawyers for Civil Party Chum Sirath)
• Lawyer’s Recognition Decision (26 May 2008) (Recognizing Silke Studzinsky and Hong Kim Suon as the Lawyers for Civil Party Phung Sunthary)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (23 May 2008) (Stating that Chum Sirath is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (9 May 2008) (Stating that Hav Sophea is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• Document Translation Request (9 May 2008) (Requesting that all documents containing the questioning of Duch be translated into French and Khmer)
• Report of the Execution of Rogatory Letter (9 May 2008) (Reporting that the Tuol Sleng Museum gave a 244 page document to the investigator listing prisoner confessions)
• Order to Bring the Charged Person for Interview (5 May 2008) (Ordering the head of the detention facility to bring the Accused to court for an interview)
• Written Record of Interview of Charged Person (29 Apr 2008) (Providing the transcript of the Co-Investigating Judges’ interview with the Accused on that date)
• Order to Bring the Charged Person for Interview (9 Apr 2008) (Ordering the head of the detention facility to bring the Accused to court for an interview)
• Summonses of Lawyer (9 Apr 2008) (Summoning the Defence Lawyers to court for an interview with the Accused)
• Notification of Interview (9 Apr 2008) (Informing the Co-Prosecutors of the intent to interview the Accused on 29 Apr 2008)
• Written Record of Interview of Charged Person (2 Apr 2008) (Providing the transcript of the Co-Investigating Judges’ interview with the Accused on that date)
• Written Record of Interview of Charged Person (1 Apr 2008) (Providing the transcript of the Co-Investigating Judges’ interview with the Accused on that date)
• Written Record of Interview of Charged Person (28 Mar 2008) (Providing the transcript of the Co-Investigating Judges’ interview with the Accused on that date)
• Written Record of Interview of Charged Person (27 Mar 2008) (Providing the transcript of the Co-Investigating Judges’ interview of the Accused on that date)
• Summonses of Lawyer (18 Mar 2008) (Summoning the Lawyers to court for an interview with their client)
• Lawyer’s Recognition Decision (18 Mar 2008) (Recognizing Silke Studzinsky as the lawyer for certain Civil Parties)
• Report of Execution of Rogatory Letter (17 Mar 2008) (Reporting on the investigation of photographs and film at the Tuol Sleng Museum)
• Notification of Interview (13 Mar 2008) (Informing the Co-Prosecutors of the intent to interview the Accused on 27, 28, and 31 March and 1-2 April 2008)
• Information on Your Rights and Obligations as a Result of Your Designation as a Civil Party Lawyer (13 Mar 2008) (Advising Hong Kim Suon of his rights as the lawyer for a Civil Party)
• Order to Bring the Charged Person for Interview (13 Mar 2008) (Ordering the head of the detention facility to bring the Accused to court for an interview)
• Summonses of Lawyer (13 Mar 2008) (Summoning the Defence Lawyers to court for an interview with the Accused)
• Written Record of the Swearing of Interpreters and Translators (7 Mar 2008) (Providing the transcript of the swearing in of three translators and interpreters)
• CD of the Recording of Duch Interviews on 4-6 May 1999 (3 Mar 2008) (Furnishing a recording of the Duch Interview per request)
• Report of Reconstruction (26 Feb 2008) (Reporting on a visit to Cheung Ek Memorial)
• Summonses of Lawyer (19 Feb 2008) (Summoning the Defence Lawyers to investigative sites and to court for an interview with the Accused)
• Notification of Interview (19 Feb 2008) (Informing the Co-Prosecutors that the Co-Investigating Judges plan to visit investigative sites and interview the Accused on 26-29 Feb 2008)
• Request for Disclosure of the Hearing Written Records in French of the Witnesses and Victims (19 Feb 2008) (Requesting the written records of certain interviews be available in French)
• Access to the Investigation File (18 Feb 2008) (Complaining that the Case File is currently easily accessible to anyone who can get into the Records room and requesting that access to the Case File is strictly restricted)
• Lawyer’s Recognition Decision (18 Feb 2008) (Recognizing Yong Phanith as the lawyer for Bou Meng)
• Access to the Investigation File (18 Feb 2008) (Requesting that access to the case files be restricted to persons who are authorized to access them)
• Re: Civil Party Lawyer Recognition Request- Bou Meng (15 Feb 2008) (Requesting to have Yong Phanith recognized as the attorney for Bou Meng)
• Order to Bring the Charged Person for Interview (9 Feb 2008) (Ordering the Director of the detention facility to bring the Accused to court and investigative sites on 26-29 Feb 2008)
• Order to Bring the Charged Person for Interview (5 Feb 2008) (Ordering the Director of the detention facility to bring the Accused to court on 18 & 19 Feb 2008)
• Notification of Interview (5 Feb 2008) (Informing the Co-Prosecutors that the Co-Investigating Judges plan to interview the Accused on 18 & 19 Feb 2008)
• Summonses of Lawyer (5 Feb 2008) (Summoning the Defence Lawyers to court for an interview with the Accused)
• Re: Kaing Guek Eav: Permanent Assignment of Co-Lawyers (1 Feb 2008) (Assigning Kar Savuth and Francois Roux as the permanent Co-Lawyers of the Accused)
• Lawyer’s Recognition Decision (31 Jan 2008) (Recognizing Hong Kim Suon as the attorney for Chhin Navy)
• Power of Attorney Letter (30 Jan 2008) (Informing the ECCC that Chhin Navy has chosen Attorney Hong Kim Suon to represent him)
• Documents Held by the Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum (29 Jan 2008) (Informing the museum that it may be necessary to consult documents located at the museum)
• Rogatory Letter (29 Jan 2008) (Delegating the task of consulting and obtaining documents from the Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum)
• Written Record of Interview of Charged Person (24 Jan 2008) (Providing the transcript of the Co-Investigating Judges’ interview of the Accused on that date)
• Written Record of the Swearing of Witness (22 Jan 2008) (Providing the transcript of the swearing in of Francois Bizot)
• Written Record of Interview of Charged Person (21 Jan 2008) (Providing the transcript of the Co-Investigating Judges’ interview with the Accused on that date)
• Request to Renew the Recognition of the Lawyers of the Charged Persons and to Permit Case Manager and Legal Consultant to Visit the Charged Persons and to Access to Case Files (21 Jan 2008) (Deciding to renew the recognition of the Lawyers and that requests to visit the charged persons and to gain access to case files should only come from the lawyers of the charged persons)
• Re: Kaing Guek Eav (16 Jan 2008) (Extending the provisional assignment of the Co-Lawyers of Kaing Guek Eav until the end of January 2008)
• Order to Bring Charged Person For Interview (9 Jan 2008) (Ordering the Director of the detention facility to bring the Accused to court on 21 & 24 Jan 2008)
• Notification of Interview (9 Jan 2008) (Informing the Co-Prosecutors that the Co-Investigating Judges plan to interview the Accused on 21 & 24 Jan 2008)
• Summonses of Lawyer (9 Jan 2008) (Summoning the Defence Lawyers to court for an interview with the Accused)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (28 Dec 2007) (Stating that Chum Mey is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• Change of Numbers of Civil Party Applications (28 Dec 2007) (Listing the changes made to the numbers of certain Civil Party Applicants)
• Status of Your Civil Party Application (28 Dec 2007) (Stating that Chhin Navy is now considered to be a Civil Party)
• List of Defense Teams Able to Consult and Access the Investigation Case Files (20 Dec 2007) (Confirming that the Defense Teams of Khieu Samphan, Ieng Sary, Ieng Thirth, Nuon Chea and Kaing Guek Eav have the right to consult and access the Investigation Case Files)
• Co-Prosecutors’ Notification of Languages of Filing and Receipt of Documents (12 Dec 2007) (Notifying the Chambers that they intend to file documents in Khmer and English)
• Documents Held by the Document Center of Cambodia (7 Dec 2007) (Informing the DC-Cam that it may be necessary to consult documents in their possession)
• Rogatory Letter (7 Dec 2007) (Delegating necessary investigative action to ECCC Investigators Sim Sorya and Steve Heder)
• Order to Bring Charged Person For Interview (30 Nov 2007) (Ordering the Director of the detention facility to bring the Accused to court on 4 Dec 2007)
• Written Record of Interview of Charged Person (29 Nov 2007) (Providing the transcript of the Co-Investigating Judges’ interview with the Accused on that date)
• Response to the Request Dated November 19, 2007 by Kaing Guek Eav’s Lawyers (20 Nov 2007) (Stating that only the Accused’s relatives may visit and that other persons are not authorized)
• Summonses of Lawyer (19 Nov 2007) (Summoning the Defence Lawyers to court for an interview with the Accused)
• Order to Bring Charged Person For Interview (19 Nov 2007) (Ordering the Director of the detention facility to bring the Accused to court on 22 & 29 Nov 2007)
• Notification of Interview (19 Nov 2007) (Informing the Co-Prosecutors that the Co-Investigating Judges plan to interview the Accused on 22 & 27 Nov 2007)
• Written Record of Interview of Witness (1 Nov 2007) (Providing the transcript of the interview with Nhem En on that date)
• Written Record of the Swearing of Interpreter (1 Nov 2007) (Providing the transcript of the swearing in of the interpreter on that date)
• Written Record of Interview of Charged Person (3 Oct 2007) (Providing the transcript of the Co-Investigating Judges’ interview with the Accused on that date)
• Written Record of Interview of Charged Person (3 Oct 2007) (Providing the transcript of the Co-Investigating Judges’ interview with the Accused on that date)
• Co-Prosecutors’ Request for Leave to File Responses to Amicus Curie Briefs Submitted in the Defence Appeal of Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch Regarding Provisional Detention (3 Oct 2007) (Requesting the ability to respond to any amicus curiae briefs submitted to the OCIJ)
• Re: Assignment of Co-Lawyers to Mr. Kaing (3 Oct 2007) (Provisionally assigning Kar Savuth and Francois Roux to the Accused for another month)
• Written Record of Interview of Charged Person (2 Oct 2007) (Providing the transcript of the Co-Investigating Judges’ interview with the Accused on that date)
• Lawyer and Communication with Detainees (1 Oct 2007) (Requesting that the head of the detention facility take precautions to ensure that the detainees to do not speak to anyone from the outside)
• Written Record of Interview of Witness (25 Sept 2007) (Providing the transcript of the interview with Prak Khan on that date)
• Notification of Interview (20 Sept 2007) (Informing the Co-Prosecutors of the intent to interview the Accused on October 2-3, 2007)
• Summonses of Lawyer (20 Sept 2007) (Summoning the Defence Lawyers to court for an interview with the Accused)
• Order to Bring the Charged Person for Interview (20 Sept 2007) (Ordering the head of the detention facility to bring the Accused to court for an interview)
• Separation Order (2007 Sept 19) (Separating the Case File of Duch for facts committed inside the S-21 framework)
• Request to Provide a Number of Books for Our Client (19 Sept 2007) (Requesting to provide the Accused with books that are helpful in his defence)
• Request for an Access to and Consulting Investigation Files in the Case Map (19 Sept 2007) (Requesting access to the Case Map)
• Forwarding Order for the Purpose of Separation (18 Sept 2007) (Deciding to forward the Case File to the Co-Prosecutors for their opinion on whether to separate the Duch case)
• Written Record of Interview of Charged Person (23 Aug 2007) (Providing the transcript of the Co-Investigating Judges’ interview with the Accused on that date)
• Written Record of Interview of Charged Person (23 Aug 2007) (Providing the transcript of the Co-Investigating Judges’ interview with the Accused on that date)
• Record of Appeals (23 Aug 2007) (Giving notice that the Co-Laywers of the Accused plan to appeal the detention order)
• Kaing Guek Eav, OCIJ, Order of Provisional Detention (31 July 2007)
• Written Record of Adversarial Hearing (31 July 2007) (Providing the transcript of the adversarial hearing on that date)
• Arrest Warrant (30 July 2007) (Ordering the arrest of Kaing Guek Eav)
• Detention Order (31 June 2007) (Ordering the detention of Kaing Guek Eav)
• In the Matter of the Complaint Filed by Mr. Sakkak Rattanakchhat Trongdeng Rainsei Date 11 January 2007 (8 Jan 2008) (Requesting that the complaint be re-filed with the Office of Co-Prosecutors)

Pleadings

• Transcript of the Appeal Hearing (5 Dec 2008) (Providing the transcript of the proceedings on that date)
• Kaing Guek Eav, PTC, Def., Response to the Amicus Curaie Briefs (25 Nov 2008)(French)
• Ieng Sary’s Motion for Reconsideration of Ruling on the Filing of a Motion by the Charged Person Ieng Sary in the Case Against the Charged Person “Duch” (24 Nov 2008) (Stating that the ruling violates the right of Ieng Sary to a public and transparent judicial process and requesting that the Chamber reconsider the motion)
• Kaing Guek Eav, PTC, Civil Party, Response to the Joint Criminal Enterprise Amicus Briefs (17 Nov 2008)(concluding Joint Criminal Enterprise III is an acceptable mode of liability at the ECCC)
• Kaing Guek Eav, PTC, Civil Party, Response to the Joint Criminal Enterprise Amicus Briefs (17 Nov 2008)(arguing that Joint Criminal Enterprise III is not an acceptable mode of liability at the ECCC)
• Kaing Guek Eav, PTC, Pros., Response to the Joint Defence Application to Intervene in the Appeal (4 Nov. 2008)(opposing applications of Nuon Chea, Ieng Thirith, and Khieu Samphan to file pleadings opposing joint criminal enterprise as a permissible mode of liability)
• Kaing Guek Eav, PTC, Amici: Professor Antonio Cassese, Re Appeal of Closing Order (28 Oct. 2008) (discussing Joint Criminal Enterprise liability)
• Kaing Guek Eav, PTC, Amici: Professor Dr. K. Ambos, Re Appeal of Closing Order (28 Oct. 2008)(discussing Joint Criminal Enterprise liability)
• Urgent Joint Defence Request to Intervene in the ‘Application of the Theory of JCE’ in the OCP Appeal Against the Duch Closing Order (23 Oct 2008)
• Ieng Sary’s Motion to Disqualify Professor Antonio Cassese and Selected Members of the Board of Editors and Editorial Committee of the Journal of International Criminal Justice from Submitting a Written Amicus Curiae Brief on the Issue of Joint Criminal Enterprise in the Co-Prosecutor’s Appeal of the Closing Order Against Kaing Guek Eav “Duch” (3 Oct 2008) (Arguing that the people in question do not qualify as amicus curiae before the ECCC because of their lack of impartiality on the issue of Joint Criminal Enterprise)
• Ieng Sary’s Request to Amend His Expedited Request to Make Submission on the Application of Joint Criminal Enterprise Liability in the Co-Prosecutors’ Appeal of the Closing Order Against Kaing Guek Eav “Duch” (24 Sept 2008) (Requesting that Ieng Sary have time to make submissions in response to Ground 2 of the Co-Prosecutors’ Appeal on the application of joint criminal enterprise liability)
• Recognition of Civil Party Lawyers (22 Sept 2008) (Recognizing Moch Sovannary as a Co-Lawyer for Meas Keth)
• Recognition of Civil Party Lawyers (17 Sept 2008) (Recognizing Kim Mengkhy, Martine Jacquin and Philippe Canonne as the Co-Lawyers for Tioulong Neva)
• Recognition of Civil Party Lawyers (17 Sept 2008) (Recognizing Kim Mengkhy, Martine Jacquin and Philippe Canonne as the Co-Lawyers for Tioulong Antonya)
• Recognition of Civil Party Lawyers (17 Sept 2008) (Recognizing Kim Mengkhy, Martine Jacquin and Philippe Canonne as the Co-Lawyers for Kimari Nevinka)
• Directions to the Parties Concerning Ieng Sary’s Request to Make Submissions on Joint Criminal Enterprise Liability (16 Sept 2008) (Directing the parties to respond to the submission within 3 days)
• Co-Prosecutors’ Appeal of the Closing Order Against Kaing Guek Eav “Duch” Dated 8 August 2008 (5 Sept 2008) (Requesting that the Pre-Trial Chamber amend the indictment against the Accused to include the crimes of homicide and torture and JCE liability)
• Kaing Guek Eav, PTC, Pros., Appeal of the Closing Order Against Kaing Guek Eav “Duch” Dated 8 Aug 2008 (5 Sept. 2008)
• Transcript of Duch Appeal Hearing (21 Nov 2007) (Providing the transcript of the adversarial hearing on that date)
• Transcript of Duch Appeal Hearing (20 Nov 2007) (Providing the transcript of the adversarial hearing on that date)
• Summons (19 Nov 2007) (Summonsing the Accused to court for a hearing)
• Report of Examination (19 Nov 2007) (Explaining the details for the decision appealed against)
• Report of Examination (19 Nov 2007) (Setting out the details of the decision that is being appealed and the facts currently at issue in the court)
• Co-Prosecutors’ Notification of Delegation of Powers Pursuant to Rules 13(1) and 13(4) of the Internal Rules (15 Nov 2007) (Stating that oral advocacy in hearings may also be conducted by one or more of the Deputy, Senior Assistant and Assistant Co-Prosecutors)
• Written Record of Directions Hearing (15 Nov 2007) (Providing the written record of the hearing on 15 November 2007)
• Written Record of Directions Hearing (15 Nov 2007) (Providing the transcript of the directions hearing on that date)
• Co-Prosecutors’ Response to Amici Curiae Briefs Relating to the Defence Appeal of the Co-Investigating Judges’ Order of the Provisional Detention of Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch on 31 July 2007 (12 Nov 2007) (Reserving the right to raise any issues it may have with any brief at the oral hearing)
• Summons (12 Nov 2007) (Summonsing the Accused to court for a directions hearing)
• Kaing Guek Eav, PTC, Amici: McGill Centre for Human Rights and Legal Pluralism, Re Appeal of Closing Order (28 Oct. 2008)(discussing Joing Criminal Enterprise liabililty)
• In the Matter of the Appeal by Kaing Guek Eav (Duch) Against the Order of Provisional Detention by the Office of the Co-Investigating Judges date 31 July 2007 (4 Oct 2007) (Providing the Amicus Curiae brief of Anne Heindel)
• Kaing Guek Eav, PTC, Amici Anne Heindel, Re Appeal from Provisional Detention (4 Oct. 2007)
• Khmer version
• Co-Prosecutors’ Request for Leave to File Responses to Amicus Curiae Briefs Submitted in the Defence Appeal of Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch Regarding Provisional Detention (3 Oct 2007) (Requesting 15 days to respond to any submitted amicus curiae brief)
• Amicus Curiae Brief Relating to the Appeal Challenging the Order of Provisional Detention of 31 July 2007 (3 Oct 2007) (Providing the Amicus Curiae brief of The Center for Social Development & The Asian International Justice Initiative)
• Brief of Professor David Scheffer, International Law Expert, as Amicus Curiae in Support of the Co-Investigating Judges (3 Oct 2007) (Providing the Amicus Curiae brief of Professor David Scheffer)
• Amicus Curiae Brief Relating to the Appeal by Kaing Guek Eav, Alias Duch, Against the Order of Provisional Detention by the Co-Investigating Judges (3 Oct 2007) (Providing the Amicus Curiae brief of the Cambodian Human Rights Action Committee)
• Kaing Guek Eav, PTC, Pros., Response to Defence Appeal Against Order of Provisional Detention (3 Oct. 2007)(prefaced by PTC Ruling on Defence Request for Redaction)
• Kaing Guek Eav, PTC, Amici: Professor David Scheffer, Re Appeal from Provisional Detention (3 Oct. 2007)
• Khmer version
• Amicus Curiae Brief Regarding Appeal of the 31 July 2007 Order of Provisional Detention (2 Oct 2007) (Providing the Amicus Curiae brief of Jeffrey M. Kahan)
• Kaing Guek Eav, PTC, Amici: Jeffrey M. Kahan, Re Appeal from Provisional Detention (2 Oct. 2007)
• Brief of Stan Starygin, Amicus Curiae in Support of the Detainee(27 Sept 2007) (Providing the amicus curiae brief of Stan Starygin)
• Kaing Guek Eav, PTC, Def, Appeal Brief Challenging Provisional Detention (5 Sept. 2007)

Orders, Decisions and Judgments

• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Decision on Admissibility of Material in Case File as Evidence, E43/4 (26 May 2009)(finding certain interviews of deceased witnesses and of Duch himself inadmissible, but finding the Chheun Sothy report admissible)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Decision to Extend Time Limit for Decision on Request for Release, E39/4 (24 April 2009)(extending time limit for decision on the defence request for conditional release based on Duch’s earlier military detention, to allow for time to translate the military’s case file into English and French)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Decision on Civil Party Request to Make Opening Statement, B23/4 (27 March 2009)(request denied)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Decision on Scheduling, E26 (20 March 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Decision on Motion Regarding Deceased Civil Party, E2/5/3 (13 March 2009)(allowing husband to continue civil party action instituted by deceased wife)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Decision on Admissibility of New Materials and Instructions to Parties, E5/10/2 (11 March 2009)(establishing rules for the admission of documents, namely that they (1) are filed before applicable deadlines or are filed late with good cause and (2) prima facie appear relevant to the ascertainment of the truth, and admitting a document and videotapes pursuant to these rules)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Decision on Civil Party Status of Applicants E2/36, E2/51, and E2/69, E2/94/2 (4 March 2009)(declaring E2/51 and E2/69 as civil parties and rejecting E2/36 due to improper identification)
• Kaing Guek Eav, PTC, Decision on Appeal Against Closing Order(5 Dec 2008)(granting the Co-Prosecutor’s appeal to include domestic crimes of torture and murder in the OCIJ Closing Order indicting Duch but denying the Co-Prosecutor’s appeal to include joint criminal enterprise as a mode of liability)
• Kaing Guek Eav, PTC, Decision on Joint Defence Request to Intervene on the Issue of Joint Criminal Enterprise (5 Nov. 2008)(denying request on the same grounds as the 16 Oct 2008 decision denying Ieng Sary’s request to disqualify the amicus curiae)
• Kaing Guek Eav, PTC, Public Notice of Recusal of Judge Ney Thol(13 Oct. 2008)(Judge Ney Thol recuses himselffrom consideration of Prosecutor’s Appeal from Closing Order)
• Decision on Trial Chamber Request to Access the Case File (11 Sept 2008) (Granting the Judges of the Trial Chamber access to the Case File)
• Directions to the Parties Concerning Trial Chamber Request to be Granted Access to the Case File (2 Sept 2008) (Directing the parties to file any objections to the request by the end of the week)
• Ruling on Defence Request for Redaction of Some Parts of Co-Prosecutor’s Response to Appeal Brief- Order of Provisional Detention (6 Dec 2007) (Granting the redaction requests to the public version of the document)
• Ruling on Defence Request for Redaction of Some Parts of Co-Prosecutor’s Response to Appeal Brief- Order of Provisional Detention (6 Dec 2007) (Granting the request for redactions to be made to the public version of the document)
• Kaing Guek Eav, PTC, Decision on Appeal Against Provisional Detention Order (3 Dec. 2007)
• Ruling Concerning Co-Prosecutors’ Notification of Delegation of Powers in Appeal by Charged Person Against Provisional Detention Order (20 Nov 2007) (Deciding only Deputy Prosecutors may assist with the prosecution at hearings before the Chamber)
• Ruling Concerning Co-Prosecutors’ Notification of Delegation of Powers in Appeal by Charged Person Against Provisional Detention Order (20 Nov 2007) (Holding that the PTC does not give general declarative rulings but that only deputy prosecutors are able to assist the Co-Prosecutor before the Chambers of the ECCC)
• Order to Bring Charged Person Before Court (19 Nov 2007) (Ordering the Director of the detention facility to bring the Accused to court on 21 Nov 2007)
• Kaing Guek Eav, PTC, Report on the Examination of the Appeal from Provisional Detention (19 Nov. 2007)
• Order to Bring Charged Person Before Court (16 Nov 2007) (Ordering the Director of the detention facility to bring the Accused to court on 20 Nov 2007)
• Order to Bring Charged Person Before Court (16 Nov 2007) (Ordering the Director of the detention facility to bring the Accused to court on 15 Nov 2007)
• Order to Bring Charged Person Before Court (12 Nov 2007) (Ordering the detention facility to bring Duch to the 15 November 2007 hearing)
• Summons (12 Nov 2007) (Officially summonsing Duch to court on 20 November 2007)
• Order to Bring Charged Person Before Court (12 Nov 2007) (Ordering the detention facility to bring Duch to the 20 November 2007 hearing)
• Scheduling Order (23 Oct 2007) (Scheduling a hearing for 20 November 2007)

• Press Statement of the International Co-Prosecutor (24 April 2009)
• Statement concerning Duch Closing Order (21 Aug. 2008)
• Record of Interview (14 Aug 2007) (Providing the written record of the interview of Chhang Youk on that date)

Pleadings

• Report on Kaing Guek Eav’s Refusal to Meet with the Defense Support Section (4 May 2010) (Stating that the detention facility has complied with the detainee’s refusal to meet with the DSS)
• Request for Permission to Visit Kaing Guek Eav (11 Mar 2010) (Requesting that DSS be allowed to visit Duch in order to discuss replacing a co-lawyer)
• Transcript of Trial Proceedings (23 Nov 2009) (Providing the transcript of trial proceedings occurring in the Trial Chamber on that date)
• Request for Update of Risk Assessment for Witness D14 (29 July 2009) (Requesting that WESU update the risk assessment for the witness and to inquire into whether she wishes to testify)
• Confirmation of Request to Call Ms Meas Kimsieu as a Witness (D14) (22 July 2009) (Requesting to call the mother of the Accused to testify)
• Transcript of Trial Proceedings (20 July 2009) (Providing the transcript of the closed trial proceedings occurring in the Trial Chamber on that date)
• Transcript of Trial Proceedings (11 June 2009) (Providing the transcript of the closed trial proceedings occurring in the Trial Chamber on that date)
• Group 1- Civil Parties’ Co-Lawyers’ Reply to Defence Response on Witness and Document List (10 Apr 2009) (Requesting that the Trial Chamber allow Civil Parties the right to partake in the debate on sentencing)
• Annex- List of Documents Received from the Archive of Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum (3 Apr 2009) (Listing all of the documents received from the museum)
• Investigations at the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2 Apr 2009) (Stating that research is being done concerning relevant documents that may be in the archives of the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
• Defence Response Concerning the Lists of Witnesses and Documents Filed by  the Co-Lawyers for the Group 1 Civil Parties(24 Mar 2009) (Requesting that the Trial Chamber determine the role civil parties in the trial, requesting to dismiss two people on the witness list and requesting that the Trial Chamber rule that civil parties cannot address the court regarding sentencing)
• Direction Concerning Lists of Witnesses and Experts of Civil Party Groups 1 and 3 (23 Mar 2009) (Directing the Civil Party groups to provide the chamber with information requested regarding witness lists)
• Request to the Office of the Co-Investigating Judges Concerning a Document Referred to by Witness TC1 (23 Mar 2009) (Requesting the OCIJ to indicate whether they have inquired into the whereabouts or are in the possession of a document the witness received in 1971)
• Request to Appoint a Psychologist for Kaing Guek Eav Alias Duch(16 Mar 2009) (Requesting that the Trial Chamber appoint a psychologist for Duch for the entire trial)
• Order to Bring (16 Mar 2012) (Ordering Duch to be brought to the main court room of the ECCC on 20 March 2012 at 8:30 A.M. to be questioned by the court)
• Order to Bring (13 Mar 2012) (Ordering Duch to be brought to the main court room of the ECCC on 19 March 2012 at 1:30 P.M. to be questioned by the court)
• Rule 92 Motion of Co-Prosecutors to Submit Analyses of Witness Statements (11 Mar 2009) (Submitting the Rule 92 submission of analyses of prior witness statements)
• Co-Prosecutors’ Final Trial Submission with Annexes 1-5 (11 Nov 2009) (Giving the Co-Prosecutors’ entire overview of Case 001)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Def., Accused’s Final Written Statement, E159/8 (11 November 2009) (statement by Kaing Guek Eav to the Trial Chamber)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Def., Final Written Submission, E159/8 (11 November 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Civil Party (Group 3), Final Submission, E159/5 (11 November 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Civil Party (Group 1), Final Written Submission, E159/4 (10 November 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Civil Party (Group 1), Final Submission, E159/7 (10 November 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Civil Party (Group 2), Rule 92 Submission, E171 (22 September 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Def., Response to the Co-Prosecutors’ Request for the Application of the Joint Criminal Enterprise Theory in the Present Case, E73/2 (17 September 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav,TC, Civil Party (Group 3), Brief in Support of the Co-Prosecutors’ Request for the Application of the Joint Criminal Enterprise Theory in the Present Case, E73/3 (16 September 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Civil Party (Group 2), Appeal of Co-Lawyers for Civil Parties (Group 2) against Trial Chamber’s Decisions to Exclude Civil Party Lawyers from Questioning the Accused, Witnesses and Experts on the Accused’s Character and to Exclude Civil Parties from Submissions on Sentencing, E169 (16 September 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Civil Party (joint civil parties), Civil Parties’ Co-Lawyers’ Joint Submission on Reparations, E159/3 (14 September 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Pros., Request for Postponement of the Hearing of the Closing Statements, E159/1 (28 August 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Pros., Rule 92 Submission on Applicable Substantive Law, E153 (20 August 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Def., Response to Groups 1 and 2 – Civil Parties’ Co-Lawyers Joint Request for a Ruling on the Standing of Civil Party Lawyers to make Submissions on Sentencing, E72/2 (18 August 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Civil Party (Group 1), Motion to establish nature of relationship between four civil parties of group 1 and direct victims of S-21, E140 (6 August 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Decision on Admissibility of Vietnamese Film Footage, E5/10/5 (29 July 2009) (finding the film inadmissible on the grounds that it is superfluous and that its authenticity is questionable)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Decision on OCP Request that the Defense Request Regarding Self-Incrimination be Classified as “Confidential,” E107/1 (22 July 2009) (denying the OCP request for a hearing on the issue of whether or not the Defense Request should be classified confidential; reiterating the strong presumption towards openness; and reminding the Defense that warning witnesses about their right against self-incrimination is the responsibility of the judges, not counsel)
• Duch, TC, Pros., Response to Civil Parties’ Request on the Standing of Civil Party Lawyers to Make Submissions on Sentencing, E72/1 (30 June 2009) (stating that the Co-Prosecutors have no view on the issue but noting that, while the Internal Rules and the Cambodian Code of Criminal Procedure make no mention of civil party submissions on sentencing, such submissions appear to be the practice of Cambodian courts)
• Duch, TC, Civil Party (Group 1), Reply to Co-Prosecutors Response to Request for Disclosure of UN-OIOS Report, E65/5 (16 June 2009)
• Duch, TC, Civil Party (Groups 1 and 2), Joint Request for a Ruling on the Standing of Civil Party Lawyers to Make Submissions on Sentencing, E72 (9 June 2009) (arguing that civil parties should be permitted to make submissions on sentencing, given that such submissions would not only be relevant but also provide a unique and important perspective)
• Duch, TC, Pros., Request for the Application of Joint Criminal Enterprise, E73 (8 June 2009) (requesting the application of the doctrine of Joint Criminal Enterprise on the grounds that the doctrine was adequately plead in the Final Submission and was applicable during the period in which Duch’s alleged crimes were committed)
• Duch, TC, Civil Party (Group 2), Response to Request by Civil Party Group 1 for Disclosure of UN-OIOS Report, E65/3 (4 June 2009) (arguing that disclosure of the UN-OIOS report on corruption at the ECCC is necessary to protect judicial transparency and the fair trial rights of the parties)
• Duch, TC, Pros., Response to Certain Civil Parties’ Request for Disclosure of UN-OIOS Report, E65/2 (2 June 2009) (arguing that TC deliberation on the request for disclosure of the UN-OIOS report on corruption at the ECCC should be deferred until the PTC has decided appeals on the same issue by other charged persons; in the alternative, arguing that the TC should deny the request for lack of jurisdiction, though noting that disclosure would increase the tribunal’s credibility)
• Transcript of Trial Proceedings (21 May 2009) (Providing the transcript of the closed trial proceedings occurring in the Trial Chamber on that date)
• Duch, TC, Civil Party (Group 1), Request for Disclosure of UN-OIOS Report, E65 (11 May 2009) (requesting that the TC order the disclosure of the UN-OIOS report on corruption)
• Group1- Civil Parties’ Co-Lawyers’ Reply to Defence Response on Witness and Document List (10 Apr 2009) (Requesting that the Trial Chamber disregard submissions relating to the Civil Parties’ right to be included in the debate on sentencing)
• Transcript of Trial Proceedings (7 Apr 2009) (Providing the transcript of the closed trial proceedings occurring in the Trial Chamber on that date)
• Request to the Office of the Co-Investigating Judges Concerning a Document Referred to by Witness TC1 (23 Mar 2009) (Requesting the OCIJ to indicate whether they have a particular document and, if so, to transmit the document to the Chamber)
• Request to Reconsider Decision on Proof of Identity for Civil Party Application (E2/36) (13 Mar 2009) (Requesting the court to reconsider the application of Civil Party Applicant E2/36)
• Rule 92 Motion of Co-Prosecutors to Admit Analyses of Witness Statements (11 Mar 2009) (Submitting witness statement analyses to the Chamber)
• Additional Proofs of Identity for Civil Party Applicants Represented by Co-Lawyers for Civil Parties (Group 1) (26 Feb 2009) (Requesting that the Trial Chamber grant recognition to Man Malymas and Lim Yun)
• Proof of Identity for Civil Party Applicants Represented by Co-Lawyers for Civil Parties (Group 1) (20 Feb 2009) (Requesting that the Trial Chamber grant recognition to Nget Uy and Robert Hamill)
• Transcript of Trial Proceedings (18 Feb 2009) (Providing the transcript of the closed trial proceedings occurring in the Trial Chamber on that date)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Pros., Motion to Submit New Evidence (28 Jan 2009)
• Death of Suos Sarin, Civil Party and Request to Recognize Her Husband Um Piseth as Civil Party in Case File No. 001/18-07-2007(23 Jan 2009) (Informing the Trial Chamber of the death of Suos Sarin and requesting that Um Piseth be recognized as a Civil Party in her place)
• Power of Attorney (20 Jan 2009) (Granting Co-Lawyers Hong Kim Suon and Silke Studzindsky the power of Attorney for Ul Say)
• Transcript of Trial Proceedings (16 Jan 2009) (Providing the transcript for the Trial Management Meeting on that date)
• Transcript of Trial Proceedings (15 Jan 2009) (Providing the transcript for the Trial Management Meeting on that date)
• Record of Interrogation (4 July 2002) (Providing the transcript between the Investigating Judge of the Military Court and Duch)
• Record of Interrogation (5 June 2002) (Providing the transcript between the Investigating Judge of the Military Court and Duch)
• Written Record of Interview (6 March 1999) (Providing the transcript of an interview between the Investigating Judge of the Military Court and Duch)

Exhibits

• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Exhibit: Organizational Chart of Democratic Kampuchea presented by Craig Etchson on 18 May, E66 (29 May 2009)
• Duch, TC, Exhibit: Chart of Khmer Rouge Leadership Structure presented by Craig Etcheson, E72 (28 May 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Exhibit: Map of Houses and Offices of Duch and Map of Phnom Penh (27 April 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Exhibit: S-21 Organizational Charts (27 April 2009)

Orders, Decisions, and Judgments

• Decision on the Defence Request to Appoint a Psychologist for Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch (30 July 2009) (Dismissing the request finding the Accused strong enough to stand trial)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Separate and dissenting opinion of Judge Jean-Marc Lavergne on Sentence of Kaing Guek Eav (26 July 2010)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Judgement, E188 (26 July 2010)
• Confirmation of Request to Call Ms Meas Kimsieu as a Witness (D14) (22 July 2009) (Maintaining its request to call the mother of the Accused)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Order relevant to the 2009 Penal Code of Cambodia , E180/1 (5 February 2010)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Order relevant to the 2009 Penal Code of Cambodia, E180/1 (5 February 2010)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Decision on Parties Requests to Put Certain Documents before the Chamber Pursuant to Rule 87 (2), E176 (28 October 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Decision on Civil Party Co-lawyers’ joint request for a ruling on the standing of Civil Party lawyers to make submissions on sentencing and directions concerning the questioning of the accused, experts and witnesses testifying on character, E72/3 (9 October 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Decision on Civil Party Co-lawyers’ joint request for a ruling on the standing of Civil Party lawyers to make submissions on sentencing and directions concerning the questioning of the accused, experts and witnesses testifying on character, E72/3 (9 October 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Scheduling Order for Closing Statements, E170 (30 September 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Decision on Group1 – Civil Parties’ Co-Lawyers’ Request that the Trial Chamber Facilitate the Disclosure of an UN-OIOS Report to the Parties, E65/9 (23 September 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Direction on Proceedings Relevant to Reparations and on the Filing of Final Written Submissions, E159 (27 August 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Schedule of the Hearing by Topic for the period of 17 August to 17 September 2009, E91/5 (14 August 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Order Scheduling the Trial Proceedings (Topics and Order of call of Witnesses) for the period of 17 August to 17 September 2009, E138 (13 August 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Decision on Request to reconsider decision on proof of identify for civil party application, E2/94/4 (10 August 2009) (declining to reconsider the Trial Chamber’s decision of 3 March 2009 in which it declared the civil party application of E2/36 to be inadmissible)
• Decision on the Defence Request to Appoint a Psychologist for Kaing Guek Eav Alias Duch (30 July 2009) (Dismissing the request for a psychologist upon finding that the Accused is strong enough to stand trial without any psychological assistance)
• Duch, TC, Decision on Ieng Sary’s Request to Make Submissions on Prosecutor’s Request for the Application of Joint Criminal Enterprise, E90 (3 July 2009) (denying the request on the basis that Ieng Sary is not a party to the proceedings against Duch)
• Duch, TC, Decision on Request for Release, E39/5 (15 June 2009) (finding that Duch’s provisional detention during trial warranted under the Internal Rules and holding that his imprisonment from 1999 to 2007 by the Cambodian military and current provisional detention by the ECCC will be credited against any judgment imposed; also finding that Duch’s prior imprisonment by the military violated domestic law and international fair trial rights and holding that Duch is entitled to a remedy to be determined at the conclusion of trial)
• Order Scheduling the Trial Proceedings for the Period of 20 to 30 April 2009 (10 Apr 2009) (Ordering the scheduling of witnesses and issues for the substantive hearing during that time period)
• Orders Concerning the Defence Request to Appoint a Psychologist for the Accused (30 Mar 2009) (Ordering Professor Sunbaunat Ka to examine the accused to determine whether Duch needs a psychologist and if so, to determine what level of psychological support is needed)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Order Scheduling the Start of the Substantive Hearing and Sitting Days for the Next Three Months (23 Feb. 2009)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (13 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Man Malymas as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (13 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Romam Yun alias Khamphy as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (11 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Pann Pech as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (11 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Hoem Mom as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (11 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Ly Hor as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (11 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Nheb Kimsrea as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (11 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Bun Srey as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (10 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Sman Nob as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (10 Feb 2009) (Recognizing El Li Mah as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (6 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Men Lay as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (6 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Puol Punloek as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (4 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Sin Sinet as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (4 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Chann Krouch as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (4 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Beng Chanthorn as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (3 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Yon Chhoeun as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (3 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Norn Kim Leang as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (3 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Ly Khiek as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (2 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Neth Phally as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (2 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Ke Samaut as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (2 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Kom Men as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (2 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Heng Ngech Hong as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (2 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Eng Sitha as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (2 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Try Ngech Leang as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (2 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Nhem Sophan as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (2 Feb 2009) (Recognizing Sman Sar as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (30 Jan 2009) (Recognizing Ruon Sreynob as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (30 Jan 2009) (Recognizing Sin Lim Sea as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (30 Jan 2009) (Recognizing Lay Chan as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (29 Jan 2009) (Recognizing Hiet Tey Chov as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (29 Jan 2009) (Recognizing So Saung as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (29 Jan 2009) (Recognizing Kimari Visaka as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (29 Jan 2009) (Recognizing Lieng Kan as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (29 Jan 2009) (Recognizing Iem Soy as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (29 Jan 2009) (Recognizing Nhek Ou Davy as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (29 Jan 2009) (Recognizing Ul Say alias Ream as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (29 Jan 2009) (Recognizing Ou Savrith as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (29 Jan 2009) (Recognizing Chhoem Sitha as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Interim Recognition as Civil Party (29 Jan 2009) (Recognizing Ou Kamela as a Civil Party in Case 001 until the Initial Hearing when the application can be considered)
• Kaing Guek Eav, TC, Internal Regulations Governing the Courtroom on Hearing Days (19 Jan. 2009)
• Recognition of Civil Party Lawyer Mr. Pierre Olivier Sur (16 Jan 2009) (Recognizing Pierre Olivier Sur as the Lawyer for Toch Monin, Chum Neou, Kaun Sunthara, Chraing Sam Ean, Kong Tes, and Ros Men)

Pleadings

• Request for Enforcement of Sentence (7 Mar 2012) (Requesting that Kaing Guek Eav begin to serve his sentence and that he should be held at the Detention Facility until his participation before the ECCC is no longer needed and there has been an agreed upon prison to transfer him to for the remainder of his sentence).
• Decision on Guidelines for Reclassification of Documents on Case File (26 July 2012) (Adopting the proposed guidelines for the reclassification of documents in Case 001)
• Co-Prosecutors’ Response to H.E. Kong Srim’s ‘Review of Confidential and Strictly Confidential Documents on Case 001 Case File’ (10 July 2012) (Agreeing with most of the proposed procedures for declassification and requesting that the process include a way to determine which documents could be declassified following redaction of material that should otherwise remain classified)
• Compilation of Statements of Apology Made by Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch During the Proceedings (16 Feb 2012) (Providing the transcripts for all apologies made by Duch during the proceedings against him)
• Kaing Guek Eav, SC, Group 1 – Civil Parties’ Co-Lawyers’ Supplementary Request to File Additional Evidence in Support of Their Appeal Against the Judgment (25 Mar 2011) (Requesting permission to file two additional pieces of evidence)
• Transcript of Trial Proceedings (23 Mar 2011) (Providing the transcript for the Trial Management Meeting on that date)
• Kaing Guek Eav, SC, Co-Prosecutors’ Response to the Appeal Brief by the Co-Lawyers for Kaing Guek Eav alias “DUCH” Against the Trial Chamber Judgment of 26 July 2010 (20 Dec 2010) (requesting the Supreme Court to reject the defense’s appeal in its entirety).
• Kaing Guek Eav, SC, Pros, Appeal against the Judgement of the Trial Chamber in the case of Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch (13 October 2010)
• Kaing Guek Eav, Group1- Civil parties’ co-lawyers’ immediate appeal of civil party status determinations from the final judgment (21 September 2010)
• Kaing Guek Eav, SC, Civil Party (Group 2), Supplementary Appeal against Trial Chamber’s Decision to Exclude Civil Party Lawyers from Questioning the Accused, Witnesses and Experts on the Accused’s Character, E169/1/1 (28 October 2009)

Orders, Decisions, and Judgments

• Case 001 Civil Parties Admitted in Trial or Appeal Judgment (3 Feb 2012) (Providing the complete list of Civil Parties admitted to the proceedings in Case 001)
• Appeal Judgement (3 Feb 2012) (Giving of detailed summary of the entire judgement against Kaing Guek Eav alias “Duch” on appeal from the Trial Court Chamber.  The judgement dismisses the Defence Appeal, affirms Duch’s conviction for the crime against humanity of persecution, enters additional convictions for the crimes against humanity of extermination (encompassing murder), enslavement, imprisonment, torture and other inhumane acts, enters a sentence of life imprisonment for Duch, grants additional Civil Party Appellants’ claims while dismissing others, and orders Duch to remain in custody until prison arrangements are finalized)
• Summary of Appeal Judgement (3 Feb 2012) (Giving a detailed summary of the Supreme Court Chamber’s findings in its Appeal Judgement in Case 001.  The Judgement dismisses the Defence appeal and grants in part and dismisses in part the Co-Prosecutors’ appeal.  The Judgement affirms Kaing Guek Eav’s conviction for the crime against humanity of persecution and enters additional convictions for the crimes against humanity of extermination (encompassing murder), enslavement, imprisonment, torture, and other inhumane acts.  The Judgement enters a sentence of life imprisonment for Kaing Guek Eav.  The Judgement also grants in part and dismisses in part Civil Party applications and provides a list of additional Civil Parties who have demonstrated on appeal that they suffered harm as a direct consequence of the crimes committed by Kaing Guek Eav)
• Kaing Guek Eav, SC, Decision on Group 1 – Civil Parties’ Co-Lawyers’ Supplementary Request to Admit Additional Evidence (29 Mar 2011) (Granting the request)
• Kaing Guek Eav, SC, Decision on characterisation of group 1 – civil party co-lawyers’ immediate appeal of civil party status determinations in the trial judgment (30 September 2010)
• Kaing Guek Eav, SC, Decision on the Appeals filed by lawyers for Civil Parties (Groups 2 and 3) against the Trial Chamber’s Oral Decisions of 27 August 2009, E/169/1/2 (28 December 2009)
• Kaing Guek Eav, SC, Civil Party (Groups 2 and 3), Decision on the Appeals filed by lawyers for Civil Parties (Groups 2 and 3) against the Trial Chamber’s Oral Decisions of 27 August 2009, E169/1/2 (24 December 2009)